A new mock version of an AI policing tool has sparked a heated debate over the capabilities of Flock Safety. While the company has long maintained that its technology cannot be used to track specific individuals, this demonstration suggests otherwise, raising critical questions about digital privacy and corporate transparency.
The mock tool illustrates how data patterns can be leveraged to identify and follow persons of interest, contradicting the official narrative provided to law enforcement agencies. This discrepancy highlights a growing gap between the marketed limitations of surveillance tech and its actual technical potential.
As cities continue to integrate AI-driven policing, the demand for independent audits is intensifying. This revelation serves as a wake-up call for regulators to ensure that surveillance tools are governed by strict oversight rather than relying solely on vendor assurances.
Source: Read original article